Common Order quashing two Revenue recovery writ petitions held subsumed by a prior Division Bench judgment.
No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION Nos.39960 and 39973 of 2014
Common Order: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Both Sri P. Balaji Varma, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri S. Suribabu, learned Special Standing Counsel for Commercial Taxes, would agree that the subject matter of both these writ petitions is covered by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in K.G.F. Cottons (P) Ltd., vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU and Others1 .
Following the said judgment, and in terms thereof, both these writ petitions are disposed of. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ) _____________________________ (A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J)
1st November, 2016
pnb
1 [2015] 81 VST page 1 (TS&AP)
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION Nos.39960 and 39973 of 2014
Date: 1.11. 2016
pnb
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
K.G.F. Cottons (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) LTU and OthersReferred¶6
[2015] 81 VST page 1 (TS&AP)
Ramesh Ranganathan
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
