Petition filed to declare inaction on legal notices regarding leasehold rights for rear fish as illegal. Court dismissed petition as infructuous on counsel's submission that leasehold rights had expired.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.37753 OF 2012
O R D E R :
This writ petition is filed declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action on the legal notices dated 25.11.2011 and 17.10.2012 got issued by the petitioner in respect of lease hold rights to rear fish in the tank called Peddachakirevugunta of Kuppanapudi Grampanchayat, Akividu Mandal, West Godavari District, as illegal and arbitrary.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lease hold rights for which the petitioner is claiming has already expired, as such the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J
06.12.2016 dv
2
Petitioner
Respondents
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
