Koppula Mallesham, Vs State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITON No.42098 OF 2016

ORDER:

The case of the petitioners is that they were appointed as Junior Lecturers in Civics with effect from 14-08-1998 in Zone V. Later they were promoted and transferred as lecturers in Degree College vide proceedings in Rc.No.574/Ser.III.1/2006 (V), dated 08-08-2006. The petitioners also passed NET during 1995 and 1997 respectively. The grievance of the petitioners is that their pay is fixed at Rs.24,320/- in the year 2010. Their juniors who were appointed as Junior Lecturers along with them during 1998 and promoted as Lecturers drawing Rs.28,560/- in 2010 and noticing the same, the petitioners made representation to the 2^nd respondent on 20-01-2016 and 18-02-2016 to rectify the anomaly in fixing their pay. The 2^nd respondent issued instructions to the Principal, Kakatiya Government College, Hanmakonda requesting him to provide information. The Principal, Kakatiya Junior College submitted information on 04-08-2016 to the 2^nd respondent for rectifying anomaly. As no action has been taken, the present writ petition is filed.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Education.

¶5

2

¶6

Since it is stated that proposals for rectifying the anomaly in respect of petitioners is pending, the 2^nd respondent is directed to consider the proposals sent by the Principal, Kakatiya Junior College on 04-08-2016 and take action in accordance with law.

¶7

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

¶8

_________________________
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
05-12-2016
nvl

¶9

3

¶10

4

Koppula Mallesham, v. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Koppula Mallesham, v. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dasari Santha Kumari, Vs Sri Harinarayana I.A.S.

Smt.K.v.Ramanamma Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

Smt.T.Saraswatamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

Smt.Boyina Malleswari Vs The District collector, Krishna District

Palagani Posham Vs The Chairman and Managing Director

D. Rajender, Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation Rep. by it