The High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous upon the submission of the respondent side that the cause of action no longer survives. No other substantive relief was granted.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. CHANDRAIAH &
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
W.P.No. 3681 of 2004
DATE: 19.01.2016
Between:
The Deputy Commissioner and three others .. Petitioners And
B.Vanaja Kumari .. Respondent
O R D E R:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice G. Chandraiah)
The learned Government Pleader for Services-II appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the cause in this writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
The submission of the learned Government Pleader is placed on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel to the dismissal of the writ petition, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
________________ G. CHANDRAIAH, J 19.01.2016 ______________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO,J
G. CHANDRAIAH, J 19.01.2016
bcj
The Deputy Commissioner and three others
B.Vanaja Kumari
G. CHANDRAIAH
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
