The Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an auction notice, holding the matter infructuous due to the auction's voluntary cancellation.
Writ petition closed; miscellaneous petitions dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No. 36107 of 2016
ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition, challenging an auction notice.
VRS,J & GSP,J WP No.36107 of 2016
2
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
_____________________ G. SHYAM PRASAD, J 1st November, 2016 cbs
VRS,J & GSP,J WP No.36107 of 2016
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN √ AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition No. 36107 of 2016 (Per VRS,J)
1st November, 2016
cbs
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
State Bank of Hyderabad
V. Ramasubramanian
G. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
