Petitioner sought admission to medical courses under the quota for children of Armed Personnel. Court dismissed petition as admissions were over.
No admission granted; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition No.33273 of 2016
Order: (per V.Ramasubramanian, J.)
Heard Sri Koppula Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent-University.
___________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
______________________ G.SHYAM PRASAD, J.
28th October, 2016. Ak
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition No.33273 of 2016 (per VRS, J.)
28th October, 2016. (Ak)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether admission to medical courses can be granted after the academic year admissions are concluded.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to be treated as a child of Armed Personnel for reservation benefits.
Petitioner
3rd Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian
G. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
