S.Rajanandam v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WP. No.35683…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP. No.35683 of 2016
O R D E R:
Petitioner’s grievance is that petitioner had filed representation dt.15.09.2016 to the 1st respondent through the 2nd respondent requesting to drop the disciplinary action, initiated against the petitioner taking into account the letter No.A2/872/2016 dt.16.08.2016 of the 2nd respondent-District Collector, Adilabad and the 1st respondent is not disposing of the same.
- The Government Pleader for Services appearing for respondents states that the 1st respondent will consider the petitioner’s representation within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate his decision thereon to the petitioner.
- In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dt.15.09.2016 within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate his decision thereon to the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.
- Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Revision shall stand closed.
_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
1st Respondent
- respondent
2nd Respondent
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/35683/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court