The writ petition was dismissed for default as no one appeared for the petitioner despite being listed under the caption for dismissal, with no costs awarded and pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
W.P.No.24336 of 2006
ORDER:
None appears for the petitioner though the matter is listed under
the caption for dismissal.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
__________________________________
JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Date: 21-10-2016
kvr
<u>None</u>
<u>None</u>
M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
