Disposed

Rudraksha Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC29 Sept 2016WP/33131/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the 4th Respondent (Revenue Officer) to dispose of pending mutation and Pattadar Pass book applications within four weeks after issuing notices to the petitioners and affected parties, following complaints of inaction despite prior directions by the District Collector.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 4th Respondent to dispose of pending mutation and Pattadar Pass book applications within four weeks after issuing notices to affected parties.

Rudraksha Anjaiah Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by… — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33131 OF 2016

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

The case of the petitioners is that they have made online applications in Form VI-A through Mee-seva to the 4^th respondent for mutation and for issuance of Pattadar Pass books and title deeds in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.1-07 guntas in Sy.No.849/B and Ac.0-32 guntas in Sy.No. 852/N situated at Gangadhara Village and Mandal, Karimnagar District. Subsequently, as no action has been taken, the petitioners approached the District Collector, who directed the 4^th respondent vide Letter No.D/0214/2014 dated 11.02.2014 to conduct detailed enquiry and take appropriate action as per rules and also directed to submit a report. Inspite of the same, the 4^th respondent failed to conduct enquiry on the applications of the petitioners. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have purchased the subject lands through registered sale deeds from their vendors and therefore, the 4^th respondent is bound to take action on the applications made by the petitioners for mutation of their names in the revenue records and for grant of pattadar pass books and title deeds in their favour.

¶5

Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

¶6

In view of the above facts and circumstances, since it is stated that the applications made by the petitioners are pending before the 4^th respondent, the 4^th respondent is directed to dispose

¶7

¶8

of the same in accordance with law within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after issuing notice to the petitioners as well as the 5^th respondent and other affected parties and take action accordingly.

¶9

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.

¶10

_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J

¶11

29-09-2016 Note: CC by one week (B/o) dv

¶12

Rudraksha Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rudraksha Anjaiah v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.G.Venkatesan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt.Katam Laxmidevamma Vs The State of Telangana

K. Govinda Naik Ananthapur District and 232 Others Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Chowdarigari Venkat Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

K. Siva Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Ghousia Begum, Vs The State of Telangana