The Court disposed of the writ petition by applying the reasons stated in a connected order of the same Court. Any pending miscellaneous petition was also disposed.
Petition disposed following reasons in connected order; no order as to costs; cross-orders disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WP No.32897 of 2016
ORDER ::
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the subject matter involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in WP No.27815 of 2016, dated 24-08-2016. This submission of the learned counsel is not disputed by the learned Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue (AP).
Dated: 28th September, 2016 NRG
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WP No.32897 of 2016
Web
Dated: 28-09-2016 NRG
3
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP No.27815 of 2016Followed¶1
Petitioner
The State
A. Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
