The High Court disposed of writ petitions seeking mandamus against the refusal to effect mutation and issue pattadar pass books, noting the existence of an alternative remedy.
Petitions disposed of; liberty granted to appeal against the rejection order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION Nos.31914, 31916, 31927 & 31931 OF 2016
COMMON ORDER:
These writ petitions are filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not effecting the mutation and issuance of pattadar pass books and title deeds in respect of the petitioners’ lands situated at Karivena Village, Boothpur Mandal, Mahbubnagar District, as illegal and arbitrary.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing of the writ petitions, the 4th respondent issued the proceedings No.B.ROR/2015 dated 20.12.2015, rejecting he application of the petitioners.
Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.
Since the petitioners have an alternative remedy of appeal to challenge the proceedings dated 20.12.2015, these writ petitions are disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the said proceedings by availing alternative remedy of appeal within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.
As a sequel to the disposal of these petitions, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
27-09-2016 dv
Petitioners
4th Respondent
A RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
