Writ petition challenging non-opening of price bid dismissed as withdrawn from standing counsel with liberty to seek other remedies trailing listed
Petitioner granted liberty to avail other remedies; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.32834 of 2016
ORDER:
1 This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not opening the Price Bid / Quotation of the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary.
2 At the time of arguments, the learned standing counsel for Agro Industries, on instructions, submitted that the second respondent rejected the Technical Bid of the petitioner.
3 The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail the remedies available to him under law. Permission is accorded.
3 Accordingly this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting the liberty as prayed for. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending in this Writ Petition, if any, shall stand closed.
Date: 28.09.2016 Kvsn
__ ________________________ T. SUNIL CHOWDARY, J.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Agro Industries
Second Respondent
T. SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
