Disposed

Mamidala Srinivasa Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Sept 2016WP/32116/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging the seizure of tractors and trailers by authorities alleging illegal sand transport. The court directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioners' release application and pass appropriate orders within three weeks, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directing the fourth respondent to consider the representation for release of vehicles and pass appropriate orders within three weeks.

Mamidala Srinivasa Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO.32116 of 2016

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the fourth respondent in seizing petitioners’ vehicles as illegal and arbitrary.

¶5

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleaders for Home, Revenue, and Mines and Geology (Telangana).

¶6

A perusal of the record reveals that the fourth respondent has intercepted the vehicles (tractors and trailers) of the petitioners on 04.9.2016 at Cherlapalli Village alleging that sand was being transported in the vehicles illegally. It is the case of the petitioners that the first petitioner is the owner of tractor and trailer bearing Nos.AP 36 W 5571 & AP 15 AH 0290; second petitioner is the owner of tractor and trailer bearing Nos.AP 36 AF 7854 & AP 36 AF 7764; and third petitioner is the owner of tractor and trailer bearing Nos.AP 15 TB 1683 & AP 15TB 1736. It is the further case of the petitioners that the sand was being transported in the vehicles with valid permits. The petitioners submitted representation to the fourth respondent on 08.9.2016 for release of the vehicles.

¶7

At the time of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.39888 of 2015 dated 09.12.2015 and that a large number of

¶8

¶9

similar and identical cases have been disposed of directing the authorities to release the seized vehicles in terms of G.O.Ms.No.3, Industries and Commerce (Mines.I) Department, dated 08.01.2015 as amended by G.O.Ms.No.15, Industries & Commerce (Mines.I) Department, dated 19.02.2015.

¶10

While concurring with the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleaders would submit that this writ petition may be disposed of in similar lines to the order of this Court in writ petition No.39888 of 2015.

¶11

In view of the above, the fourth respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 02.9.2016 for release of their vehicles and pass appropriate orders thereon in the light of the aforementioned G.Os within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶12

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶13

_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J

¶14

September 21, 2016 NOTE: Dispatch order copy in three days. (By order) YS

Mamidala Srinivasa Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mamidala Srinivasa Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Srikar Biotech Private Limited, Vs The Director of Agriculture

Fazil Ahmed Vs The State of Telangana

Maruprolu Venkateswarlu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/ s. Sri Kalyani Agro Marketing Company, Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Anukar Agri Life, Vs The Director of Agriculture

M/s. Yasaswini Bio-tech and Agri Sciences, Vs The Director of Agriculture