The single-judge court dismissed a writ petition for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and lack of representation on the day of hearing.
None. The writ petition is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.31669 OF 2012
ORDER:
As there was no representation on 04.01.2016 for the petitioner, the matter was adjourned beyond Sankranthi Vacation, 2016. On 18.01.2016 there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in the morning session or in the afternoon session as such the matter was directed to be listed on 19.01.2016 under the caption “For dismissal”.
Even today, when the matter is called, none appears for the petitioner and there is no representation on his behalf either in the morning session or in the afternoon session. However, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare was present on all occasions. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
________________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
JANUARY 19, 2016 YVL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.31669 OF 2012
Dt: 19.01.2016
YVL
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
