Partly allowed

Msvs Durga Prasad and Another v. State Represented by Itsd P.P.

Telangana HC18 Jan 2016CRLP/12971/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court intervened in the criminal proceedings against the petitioner. Upon hearing the arguments, the Court modified the appearance condition from once a week to once a month for assurance of availability to face trial before CID.

What did the court decide?

The condition of appearance before CID modified from once a week to once a month on the first Monday between 10.00 AM and 05.00 PM till end of trial.

Msvs Durga Prasad and Another Vs State Represented by Itsd… — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAO FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRA,DESH

¶2

THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTEEN PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO

¶4

LA.No 1 of 2018 IN

¶5

CRIIMINAL PETITION No.^'12971 of 2015

¶6

Between:-

¶7

M.S.V.S. Durga Prasad, S/o. Subrahmanyam.

¶8

.. Petltioner/Accused No.2 (Petitioner in Crl.P.No. 12971 of 2015 on the frle of High Court)

¶9

AND

¶10

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Itletropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad, At L.B. Nagar, through Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Cyberabad.

¶11

.. Respondent (Respondent in -do-)

¶12

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in Crl.P., the liigh Court may be^pleased to^pass an order by relaxing the conditions imposed under Crl.lvl.P.no. 10268 of 2016 dt. 27-07-2016 and Crl.P.No. 12971 ol 2015 dt. 18-01-20'16 in Crime No. 738 of 2015 of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Cyberabad,^pending disposal of Crl.P.No. 12971of 2015 on thefile of High Court.

¶13

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemo of Grounds filed herein and order of Hagh Court dl.28-07-2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.^.10268 of 201G and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.V.S. Prabhakar Rao Advocate for petitioner and of the Public Prosecuto(TS) on behalf of sole respondent No.'l-State, the Court made the following

¶14

ORDER :-

¶15

"Heard.

¶16

The condition of appearance before ClD, Hyderabad, once in a week on every Monday between 10.00 AM and 05.00 PM, is modified to appear once in a month on every first Monday between 10.00 AM and 05.00 PM till end of trial for assurance of availability to face trial.

¶17

Accordingly, the petition is ordered."

¶18

Sd/. M, RAMESH BABU, ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR

¶19

, TRUE COPY //

¶20

for ASSISTAN REGISTRAR

¶21

¶22

1.The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District 2.The Xl lvletropolitan [,4agistrate, L.B. Nagar, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District. 3.The Station House Officer, Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Cyberabad,

¶23

Ranga Reddy District.

¶24

4.Two CCs to the Public Prosecuto(Ts), High Court at Hyd.(OUT).

¶25

5.Two CCs to Sri T.V.S. Prabhakar Rao, Advocate(OPUC)

6.One spare copy.

TKK

HIGH COURT

DR.SSRB.J

DATE:02-08-2018

ORDER

l.A- N o. 1 of 201 8 IN

¶33

CRL.P.No, 12971 AF 2015

¶34

THE PETITION IS ORDERED

¶35

Il \

Msvs Durga Prasad and Another v. State Represented by Itsd P.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Msvs Durga Prasad and Another v. State Represented by Itsd P.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Regalla Venkatappa Reddy , Appi Reddy, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Amburi Devarajulu Vs The State of A.P.

Eshwarjee Dabbikaru Vs The Tahsildhar

Puram Sridhar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Jangala Siva Sankar Vs The State of A.P

S. Sogara Vs The Joint Collector and Additional District Magistrate