Mr. Nune Srinivas, v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge, while admitting a request by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permitted the withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to file a revision petition before the first respondent. The Court explicitly stated it was not inclined to express an opinion on the merits of the main case as the petitioner sought to withdraw the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a revision petition before the first respondent. No costs.
What the court decided
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY WRIT PETITION No.29844 OF 2016
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to set aside the order dated 21.05.2016 in Proceedings No.GP.D/8/2016 passed by the fourth respondent.
- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, Sri G.Narender Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing for respondent No.4 and Sri P.Mehar Srinivasa Rao, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5.
- At the time of arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a revision petition before the first respondent in view of Section 264 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The learned Government Pleader also consented for the same.
- In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for both parties, this Court is not inclined to express any opinion touching the merits of the main case.
- Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned counsel for both parties, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a revision petition before the first respondent challenging the
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
Andhra Pradesh Government
- respondent
Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development
- respondent
Gram Panchayat
- respondent
The Fifth Respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/29844/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court