This order notes that respondents acknowledged paying delayed salaries due to budget delays. The respondent undertook to pay future salaries without delay. The writ petition was consequently closed as the grievance was addressed.
Writ Petition closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP. No.29767 of 2016
O R D E R:
Heard counsel for the petitioners and the Government Pleader for Education appearing for respondents.
respondents 2 to 5 have not released their salaries for the months of June, July, and August, 2016 and sought for a direction to the respondents to pay the same.
26th October, 2016. gra
_____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to a direction to pay delayed salaries.
Petitioners
Respondents 2 to 5
M.S.Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
