Writ petition seeking relief against suspension and charges filed under Article 226. Dismissed for default due to non-appearance of petitioner and lack of representation despite listing for dismissal.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
WRIT PETITION No.2808 OF 2004
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in issuing the Suspension Order and Charge Sheet dated 08.12.2003, Vide No.01/114(2)/03-RJNR, on false charge memo No.306190, dated 27.11.2003, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to law.
No representation is made on behalf of the petitioner on 23.03.2016. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent – T.S.R.T.C. is present. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter.
Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J
Date: 28.03.2016 Ivd
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Unknown
T.S.R.T.C.
T.SUNIL CHOWDARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
