and Secretary of a Society about the absence of any Member from three consecutive meetings of the Managing Committee and his cessation as a Member under Section 21-B, and the Registrar would then, after recording his satisfaction that the Member had failed to attend the meetings, inform the Member and also the Society about his cessation; after such order is passed, Member has a right to apply to the Committee with a copy to the Registrar for reinstatement within fifteen (15) days from the date of intimation; and it is the General Body which is the ultimate authority under Section 30 which can remove the Committee Members but not the Managing Committee. It held that when the petitioner failed to attend the three consecutive meetings allegedly, it was incumbent on the Bank to report to the Registrar about this fact, but no such report has been sent by Registrar, and the Managing Committee itself passed the cessation order which is not permissible and it violated provisions of Section 21-B and Section 30 of the Act. It held that the Bank, even prior to the General Body resolution, removed the petitioner from the membership of the Managing Committee and co-opted the 4th respondent in W.P.No.2785 of 2015 in his place as a Committee Member, and since the three Committee meetings were not held validly, the petitioner did not suffer any disqualification. It held that the conclusion of the Deputy Registrar was correct and the award was rightly passed in favour of petitioner against the Bank and there is nothing to interfere with the Order passed by the Deputy Registrar.
