N. Ramanjulu, v. The District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning or discussion of legal provisions.
This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning or discussion of legal provisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.25791 of 2009
ORDER:
Mr. R. Janaki Ram holding for Mr. Ch. Srinivas, counsel for petitioner, submits that no further order is necessary.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel,
the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________ S. V. BHATT, J
June 10, 2016 DSK
Ch. Srinivas
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court