Disposed
Boddapati Sunaina v. The Correspondent
Telangana HCWP/27536/2009
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.27536…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No.27536…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
WRIT PETITION No.27536 of 2009
ORDER:
Mr. K. Ramesh Babu, counsel appearing for the first respondent institution, submits that the issue complained in this writ petition is sorted out between the petitioner and the first respondent.
2. Counsel for petitioner, however, submits that the petitioner is not in touch with him and requests the Court to place on record the submission of the counsel for the first respondent and close the writ petition.
The writ petition is closed accordingly. As a sequel,
the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________ S. V. BHATT, J
June 9, 2016 DSK
Petitioner
First Respondent Institution
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court