The bench considered two writ petitions filed in 2010. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause no longer survives. The court dismissed the petitions as infructuous.
The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition Nos.22406 & 22438 of 2010
COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petitions does not survive and that the writ petitions have become infructuous.
The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
____
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
(A.SHANKAR NARAYANA, J)
08 th December, 2016
JSU
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition Nos.22406 & 22438 of 2010
Date: 08.12.2016
JSU
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
