The writ petition regarding the allotment of seats under the management quota was found infructuous as the cause no longer survives and was dismissed without adjudication on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.20499 of 2010
Order: (Per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
The relief sought for in the writ petition is to declare the action of the respondents in allotting 30% seats under the management quota, which according to the petitioners, should not exceed 15%.
Sri S.Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that while the cause in the writ petition does not survive, the question of law may be left open for adjudication, if need be, in appropriate legal proceedings.
Leaving the question of law open to be decided, if need be, in appropriate legal proceedings, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
_________________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
_____________________________ (A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J)
7th December, 2016 pnb
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
Writ Petition No.20499 of 2010
Date: 7.12.2016
pnb
Ramesh Ranganathan
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
