The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without any substantive discussion or reasoning. This order disposes of the matter with no precedential value.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No. 21666 of 2016
Date: 5.7.2016
Between: B. Sujatha, Medak District.
… Petitioner
And The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No. 21666 of 2016
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr. P. Shravan Kumar Goud, learned counsel holding for Mr. Venkateshwar Varanasi, Advocate on record for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
____________
P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 5th July, 2016
pnb
B. Sujatha
The State of Telangana
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
