The petitioner counsel withdrew the writ petition due to subsequent developments. The court discharged the abandonment and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
As not pressed; miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.21474 of 2016
Date: 05.07.2016
Between:
Janamala Lakshmi W/o Sekhar @ Srini, Aged 34 years, Occu: Household, r/o Vaddeswaram village, Near Railway Track Tadepalli mandal, Guntur
…..Petitioner
and
The State of A P Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.
…..Respondents
The Court made the following:
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.21474 of 2016
PC: (Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B.Bhosale)
In view of the subsequent developments, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition. Accordingly, Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand disposed of.
___________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
___________________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 05.07.2016 kkm/tvk
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.21474 of 2016
Date: 05.07.2016
kkm/tvk
Janamala Lakshmi W=o Sekhar
The State of A P Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
Dilip B=Bhosale
P=Naveen=Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
