Written order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous because the selection process for the ineligible fixed-term post had concluded prior to the filing, rendering the matter irrelevant. No separate costs order was passed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.20807 OF 2007
ORDER:
On 04-10-2007, interim direction was given by this Court in W.P.M.P. No.26987 of 2007 to the respondents to consider the case of petitioners for appointment to the post of Junior Lineman, if they are, otherwise, eligible as per law, and pass appropriate orders within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
contract service post was for a fixed period, and even the matter would have become infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, stand disposed of.
___________________________
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J
September 23, 2016. Mgr
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
