K.Srinivasa Rao v. The Deputy General Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the counsel's representation. No merits were examined.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the counsel's representation. No merits were examined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.20700 OF 2007
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would represent that the matter has become infructuous and requests to dismiss the same as infructuous.
In view of the representation made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in
the writ petition, stand disposed of.
___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J
September 23, 2016. Mgr
A. Shankar Narayana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court