The Acting Chief Justice, per whom the order was passed, dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
No order as to costs; any pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.20465 OF 2008
ORDER: {Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan}
Sri A.Sreekanth Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments (Rayalaseema Area), submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
According, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.
_____
(RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ)
(U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J)
7th September 2016 RRB
Ramesh Ranganathan
U. Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
