Three writ petitions filed against a Commercial Tax notice were dismissed as infructuous since the underlying revision was disposed of. No separate order on costs.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
Writ Petition Nos.23817, 23836 and 24164 of 2016
COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Sri G. Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that these Writ Petitions were filed questioning the Revisional Show Cause Notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Andhra Pradesh, and, as the revision itself has been subsequently disposed of, the cause in these Writ Petitions do not survive and the Writ Petitions have become infructuous.
All the three Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these Writ Petitions shall stand dismissed.
________________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ
___________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
Dt: 06.09.2016 Scs / Murthy
RAMESH RANGANATHAN
U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
