Disposed

Kalam Anjireddy, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Jun 2016WP/19045/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court, confiscating unnecessary details, directed the appellate authority to dispose of the pending appeal against an eviction order within six weeks. Pending appeal, court ordered status quo regarding land possession. Petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to appellate authority to dispose of appeal within six weeks; maintenance of status quo on possession pending appeal disposal.

Kalam Anjireddy, Vs The State of Telangana — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No. 19045 of 2016

¶3

ORDER :

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare for the State of Telangana representing the respondents. At their request, the Writ Petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage.

¶5

2. Grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over the land admeasuring Ac.2.20 guntas in survey No.426/2 situated in Challasamudram Village, Yellandu Mandal, Khammam District though statutory appeal preferred by him before respondent No.3 on 01.09.2015 against the order dated 29.07.2015 passed by respondent No.2 in LTR Case No.52/2015/YLD, is pending.

¶6

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.2 passed order dated 29.07.2015 in LTR Case No.52/2015/YLD ordering eviction of the petitioner from the aforesaid land, against which the petitioner preferred statutory appeal before respondent No.3 on 01.09.2015, which is pending, and during pendency of

¶7

the statutory appeal, respondent No.5 and his subordinates are trying to interfere with possession of the petitioner over the said land.

¶8

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Social Welfare submits that a direction may be given to respondent No.3-appellate authority to pass appropriate orders in the appeal, if the appeal is still pending consideration, in accordance with the procedure.

¶9

5. Without going into merits of the case, respondent No.3 is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner against an order dated 29.07.2015 in LTR Case No.52/2015/YLD passed by respondent No.2 if the same is pending and is otherwise in order, as early as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, status quo as on today shall be maintained with regard to the possession of the property in question.

¶10

6. The Writ Petition is disposed of with the aforesaid direction. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Writ Petition shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.

¶11

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, J

¶12

16.06.2016 DRK

¶13

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶14

W.P.No.19045 of 2016

¶15

16.06.2016

Kalam Anjireddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalam Anjireddy, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Lkp Infra Projects, Vs The State of Telangana

Immadi settyAjay Babu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Balaji Biradar s/o Dhanji Rao Biradar, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its

R. Sankar Narayana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary

Sri Venkateswara Institute of Science And Technology, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal

P.Mahamuda Begum D/o P.Usman All Khan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh