Dismissing the writ petition as infructuous since an interim prayer was rejected in a pending appeal, leaving liberty to challenge that rejection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
WRIT PETITION No. 190 of 2016
BETWEEN
G.Lakshmaiah Naidu
… PETITIONER
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department and others
...RESPONDENTS
Date of Order pronounced: 05.01.2016
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after filing of the writ petition an order rejecting the interim prayer of the petitioner was passed in the pending appeal and as such this writ petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel however seeks liberty to question the rejection order aforesaid.
With the liberty as aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
January 5, 2016 LMV
G.Lakshmaiah Naidu
The State of Andhra Pradesh
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
