Allowed

Nagalli Ramudu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC4 Jan 2016WP/43124/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged Sub-Registrar's refusal to receive a sale deed. Court, following prior precedent, directed authority to receive and process the document, or record refusal reasons per Section 71.

What did the court decide?

Directing the registering authority to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner in accordance with law, or record refusal endorsement with reasons.

Nagalli Ramudu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.43124 OF 2015

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

¶5

The petitioner states that he purchased the land admeasuring 96 sq. yards in Survey No.574 of Yemmiganur Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, under a sale deed dated 18.12.2015, which is stated to have been presented for registration by paying the requisite stamp duty and registration fee as per Ex.P2 produced along with the Writ Petition and the subject document is also filed as Ex.P1. Alleging that the Sub-Registrar, Yemmiganur, Kurnool District, the 3^rd respondent, is not receiving the document presented by the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is filed. The petitioner also states that there is no Governmental interest involved in the subject land and is not notified under Section 22-A of the Registration Act.

¶6

The issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.17809 of 2015 and batch, dated 22.06.2015.

¶7

In view of the same, following the aforesaid judgment, this Writ Petition is also disposed of directing the registering authority concerned to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908 and Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and if the document is in conformity with the provisions, register and release the same in accordance with the due procedure. It is also made clear that in the event of registering authority not being satisfied with the compliance under the Registration Act or the Indian Stamp Act, appropriate refusal endorsement together with reasons shall be recorded and communicated to the petitioner in terms

¶8

of Section 71 of the Registration Act. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶9

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶10

____________________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J 04.01.2016 KH

Nagalli Ramudu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagalli Ramudu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Raveendra Reddy, S/o. M.Raghurami Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mrs.Vanaja Bompaly, Vs Union of India

Smt. Aishwarya Pathuri W/o Sri Ashok Kumar Pathuri, Vs The Union of India

Deepak Khosla, Vs The Cantonment Board

Smt. Shamshad Begum Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

D. Vinod Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana