Chiliveru Bharath Kumar, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

WRIT PETITION No. 18904 of 2016

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Government Pleader for Mines and Geology, Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri T.V.Ramana Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.8.

¶5

There is no necessity to put the unofficial respondent on notice as this Court is not venturing to adjudicate the issue on merits.

¶6

The present writ petition is filed with the following prayer:

¶7

“issuance of writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 to 8 in allowing respondent No.9 to continue quarry works in Sy.Nos.818 and 819 of Annaram Village, Manakonduru Mandal, Karimnagar District, without there being any proper approvals from the competent authorities, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law; and consequently direct respondent Nos.1 to 8 to take appropriate action against respondent No.9.”

¶8

Learned Government Pleader for Mines and Geology submits that no application is made by the petitioner before respondent No.6, who is competent to cancel the quarry operations.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to submit fresh application before the authorities concerned, in which event the same may be considered at the earliest.

¶10

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, permitting the petitioner to make fresh application before respondent No.6, in which event the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of application. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶12

_________________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶13

15.06.2016 gkv

Chiliveru Bharath Kumar, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chiliveru Bharath Kumar, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Appanna Naga Venkata Sai Anand, Vs The Station House Officer, Women Police Station

Association of Christian Professional Colleges, Vs State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary

Kavali Karunakar Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Lkp Infra Projects, Vs The State of Telangana

Immadi settyAjay Babu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Balaji Biradar s/o Dhanji Rao Biradar, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its