The High Court at Hyderabad, declaring the writ petition infructuous due to an interim order, dismissed the petition as having no survival.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
[Special Original Jurisdiction]
MONDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2016
PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION NO. 18483 OF 2014
Between: Dheeraj Vineel …. Petitioner V/s. Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology Rep.by its Principal, CBIT Campus, Gandipet, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district, Hyderabad & Anr. … Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Udaya Sri Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Deepak Bhattacharjee The court made the following: [order follows]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION NO. 18483 OF 2014
O R D E R :
No representation for petitioner. Learned counsel
appearing for respondent submits that with the passage of time
and in view of the interim order granted by this court, the writ
prayer does not survive.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
3. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in
this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
18/4/2016 I s L
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
WRIT PETITION NO. 18483 OF 2014
Date: 18/4/2016 Circulation No. Court Master: I s L
Dheeraj Vineel
Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
