A writ petition filed by J. Mahalakshmamma challenging actions against her was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner.
Disposed of as not pressed; liberty granted to approach respondent via representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No. 16606 of 2015
Date:16.06.2016
Between: J. Mahalakshmamma, Gudivada, Krishna District.
…..Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Hyderabad and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
Writ Petition No. 16606 of 2015
PC:(Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondents against the application, if any, made by respondent No.5 seeking regularisation of the unauthorised structure/construction based on G.O. Ms. No. 128, dated 22.5.2015. He seeks direction to the Government to consider the petitioner’s representation within time frame.
The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed.
It is open to the petitioner to make a representation, as aforementioned, seeking appropriate relief and if any such representation is made, we hope and trust that the concerned respondent shall consider the same on merits in accordance with law. If the petitioner makes any prayer in the representation against respondent No. 5, it is needless to mention that the concerned authority shall issue notice to respondent No.5 and grant her an opportunity to submit her reply to the representation of the petitioner. It is made clear that this Court has not examined merits of the case.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions shall also stand closed.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________
16th June, 2016 Pnb
J. Mahalakshmamma
The State of Andhra Pradesh
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
