Appellant argued writ appeal was infructuous. High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad dismissed the appeal as infructuous and also dismissed miscellaneous petitions.
Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 870 of 2015
Date: 15.06.2016
Between:
T. Sai Abhishekh
… Appellant
And
The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Hyderabad & others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT APPEAL No. 870 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the appeal has rendered infructuous.
Writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
_______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 15.06.2016 ES
T. Sai Abhishekh
The State of Telangana, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
