V. Anjaiah, v. The District Collector, Nalgonda District
Case brief
What is this about?
false
What did the court decide?
dismissed as infructuous; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
false
dismissed as infructuous; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
WRIT PETITION No.14240 of 2005
ORDER:
It is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioner that the cause of action in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________________ SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
Date: 21.04.2016 TJMR
PETITIONER
RESPONDENT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court