Disposed

Thutala Kuppaswamy Narendra Babu , Narendra v. The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp

Telangana HC19 Apr 2016CRLP/4634/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Telangana/Andhra Pradesh disposed of four Common Criminal Reference petitions filed for bail under Sections 437 and 439 of the Cr.P.C. against accused persons in a case registered at Chittoor. The court issued a common order directing relevant authorities without detailing reasoning in the provided text.

What did the court decide?

Issued a common order effecting release of accused on bail as per their respective files.

Thutala Kuppaswamy Narendra Babu , Narendra Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRAD

¶2

TUESDAY , THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND SIXTEEN

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR

¶5

CRLP .Nos.:4217,4268,4634 and 4750 of 2016

¶6

CRLP .Nos.4217 of 2016

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ramakrishnan Rajinikanth @ Rajini, S/o Late K.M.Ramakrishnan,

¶9

..... Petitioner/Accused No.19

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Andhra Pradesh rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and the State of A.P.

¶12

.....Respondent/Complainant

¶13

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to release the petitioner/ accused No.19 on bail pending investigation, inquiry and trial in Crime No.130/2015 of Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor, Chittoor District

¶14

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandam of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public Prosecutor (AP), for the Respondent.

¶15

CRLP .No.4268 of 2016

¶16

Between:

¶17

Mallamgunta Srinivasula Yoganand, S/o M. Sreenivasula Naidu,

¶18

..... Petitioner/Accused No.12

¶19

AND

¶20

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Station House Officer, Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor District, Represented by Public Prosecutor for The State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad

¶21

.....Respondent/Complainant

¶22

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in P.R.C. No 7/2016 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chittoor.

¶23

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandam of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing

¶24

the arguments of SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public Prosecutor (AP) for the Respondent. CRLP .No.4634 of 2016

¶25

Between:

¶26

Thutala Kuppaswamy Narendra Babu @ Narendra, S/o T.S. Kuppu Swamy, ..... Petitioner/Accused No.20

¶27

AND

¶28

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Station House Officer, Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor District, Represented by Public Prosecutor for the State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶29

.....Respondent/Complainant

¶30

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in P.R.C. No. 7/2016 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chittoor.

¶31

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandam of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Advocate for the Petitioner, and of the Public Prosecutor (AP) for the Respondent.

¶32

CRLP .No.4750 of 2016

¶33

Between:

¶34

1. Yenamandala Haridasu, S/o Chinnabba Naidu,

¶35

2. Nataraja Sasidhar, S/o Nataraja Gurukula

¶36

..... Petitioners/Accused No.9 and 11

¶37

AND

¶38

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Station House Officer,Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor District, Represented by Public Prosecutor for the State of Andhra Pradesh, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶39

.....Respondent/Complainanat

¶40

Petition under Sections 437 & 439 of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail in P.R.C. No. 7/2016 on the file of the Court of IV Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chittoor.

¶41

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memorandam of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Advocate for the Petitioners, and of the Public Prosecutor (AP) for the Respondent.

¶42

The Court made the following Common Order:

¶43

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶44

//TRUE COPY//

¶45

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶46

¶47

1. The IV Additioal Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Chittoor

¶48

2. The Superintendent, District Jail, Chittoor

¶49

3. The Station House Officer, Chittoor I Town Police Station, Chittoor District.

¶50

4. Two CC to the Public Prosecutor (AP), High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad (OUT)

¶51

5. One CC to SRI D PURNACHANDRA REDDY, Advocate (OPUC)

¶52

6. One CC to Sri.Karri Murali Krishna, Advocate (OPUC)

¶53

7. One spare copy

¶54

TRk

¶55

HIGH COURT

¶56

CPK.J

¶57

DATED: 19.04.2016

¶58

CRL.P.NOS.4217,4268,4634 AND 4750 OF 2016

¶59

BAIL

¶60

TRk dated: 21.4.2016

¶61

HIGH COURT

¶62

CPK.J

¶63

DATED: 19.04.2016

¶64

CRL.P.NOS.4217,4268,4634 AND 4750 OF 2016

¶65

BAIL

Thutala Kuppaswamy Narendra Babu , Narendra v. The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thutala Kuppaswamy Narendra Babu , Narendra v. The State of a.P.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pothuraju Ramana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M. Ramar , Ramu and Another Vs the State of A.P.

Karre , Karri Bhaskar Reddy Vs The State of a.P.

Mallamgunta Srinivasula Yoganand Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Repari dayamma, Vs The Ditrict Collector

V. Peddaiah, Vs The District Collector