The High Court dismissed Writ Petitions as infructuous after the passage of time, and consequently dismissed related miscellaneous petitions without costs.
The writ petitions and miscellaneous petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos. 134 and 135 of 2009
18.04.2016
WRIT PETITION No. 134 of 2009
Between: G. Kishan Reddy, Hyderabad.
… Petitioner
And The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos. 134 and 135 of 2009
COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri N.M. Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that with the passage of time, these writ petitions have rendered infructuous.
Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
_________________________ P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 18.04.2016 va/ksld
G. Kishan Reddy
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
