The court dismissed Writ Petition No. 12932 of 2009 as infructuous based on counsel's submission regarding the lapse of time, with no substantive legal question addressed.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 12932 of 2009
Dt:20.06.2016
Between:
M.Musalaiah. … Petitioner And Union of India and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 12932 of 2009
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr.J.U.M.V.Prasad, learned counsel holding for Mr.M.Chalapathi, Advocate on record for the petitioner, submits that
with the passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand
disposed of.
DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
________________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J Dt:20.06.2016 kdl
M. Musalaiah
Union of India
DILIP B. BHOSALE
P. NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
