The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, disposed of Writ Petition No. 12 of 2009 as infructuous upon the petitioner's submission that no substantive matter remained for consideration. No order as to costs was passed.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 12 of 2009
Date: 20.06.2016
Between: T. Kumar Babu … Petitioner And Govt., of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & another.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 12 of 2009
ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri B. Shashibushan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner,
submits that nothing further survives in this writ petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
_______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ
__________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 20.06.2016 ES
T. Kumar Babu
Govt. of A.P.
Dilip B. Bhosale
P. Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
