Writ petition filed by APSRTC against a Labour Court award was dismissed due to non-compliance with a prior order directing personal notice. The case involved a claim for reinstatement of a workman.
Dismissal of the Writ Petition against both respondents on account of default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
WRIT PETITION NO.10423 OF 2010
ORDER :
This Writ Petition is filed by the APSRTC against the award passed by Labour Court III, Hyderabad directing reinstatement of the 1st respondent-workman into service with continuity of service and attendant benefits, but without back wages.
The 1st respondent is the workman who invoked the jurisdiction of the Labour Court, and the 2nd respondent is the Labour Court itself which is merely a proforma party. The Writ Petition was dismissed as against the 1st respondent for noncompliance of the order of this Court dated 04.11.2013 whereby personal notice was directed to be sent within a period of four weeks, failing which the Writ Petition was to stand dismissed. Consequently, the Writ Petition must be dismissed against the 2nd respondent also. The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, ACJ
Date: 04.11.2016.
MRKR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
APSRTC
Workman / 1st Respondent
Labour Court III, Hyderabad
Ramesh Ranganathan
Acting Chief Justice
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
