Allowed

The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) v. Lanka Trinadha Bhaskara Satyanarayana S/o.

Telangana HC2 Sept 2016WA/121/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Writ Appeal No.121 of 2016, the High Court disposed of the matter arising from compulsory retirement proceedings after the parties reached an out-of-court settlement. The appellants agreed to pay a lump sum of Rs.8 lakhs as full and final settlement while declaring the respondent's right to continue receiving pension as a compulsory retiree.

What did the court decide?

Direction to appellants to pay Rs.8 lakhs lumpsum within four weeks and declare respondent's right to continue receiving pension as compulsory retiree.

The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) Vs… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy

¶2

and

¶3

The Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Shyam Prasad

¶4

Writ Appeal No.121 of 2016

¶5

Date: 02.09.2016

¶6

Between:

¶7

The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) Andhra Bank, Hyderabad and another

¶8

..Appellants

¶9

and

¶10

Lanka Trinadha Bhaskara Satyanarayana

¶11

..Respondent Counsel for the Appellants: Dr.Lanka Trinadha Bhaskara Satyanarayana Counsel for the respondent: Mr.J.Sudheer The Court made the following:

¶12

CVNR, J & GSP, J WA.No.121 of 2016 Dt: 02.09.2016

¶13

¶14

Judgment: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶15

This Writ Appeal is filed by the Deputy General Manager (Personnel) and the Assistant General Manager of the Andhra Bank feeling aggrieved by Order, dated 21-01-2016, in WP.No.7546 of 2004, whereby the learned Single Judge has set aside the punishment of compulsory retirement imposed on the respondent and directed his reinstatement into service with all consequential benefits.

¶16

This Writ Appeal underwent several adjournments. On

¶17

the initiative of this Court, both the parties have explored the possibility of an out of Court settlement. Finally, the appellants have agreed to pay to the respondent a lumpsum amount of Rs.8 lakhs towards the full and final settlement of the latter’s claim in addition to his right to receive the pension as a compulsory retiree, which is being received by him as of now. Though initially, the respondent has expected a better offer from the appellants, finally, he has given in and agreed for this proposal.

¶18

While appreciating the gesture of the appellants as well as the respondent in arriving at an out of Court settlement for giving a quietus to this vexed litigation, the Writ Appeal is

¶19

CVNR, J & GSP, J WA.No.121 of 2016 Dt: 02.09.2016

¶20

¶21

disposed of by setting aside the order of the learned Single Judge with the direction to the appellants to pay to the respondent a sum of Rs.8 lakhs within four weeks from today besides declaring the right of the respondent to continue to receive the monthly pension as a compulsory retiree.

¶22

WAMP.No.318 of 2016, filed by the appellants for interim

¶23

relief, is disposed of as infructuous.

¶24

_____
(C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)

(G.Shyam Prasad, J)
Dt: 2 nd September, 2016
lur

The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) v. Lanka Trinadha Bhaskara Satyanarayana S/o.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Deputy General Manager (Personnel) v. Lanka Trinadha Bhaskara Satyanarayana S/o.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Rajasubramanian, Vs Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-operative Credit Society

K. Vijayasimha Reddy, Vs The Bank of India

Sri Paul Ravia Kumar Boosi, Vs Mediation and Arbitration Centre

Sri Jayanthi Giriswamy, Vs The Authorised officer

Sri.Ambica Krishna, Vs M/s Indian Overseas Bank

B Hiranyakshudu and Others Vs -