Partly allowed

Sri Paul Ravia Kumar Boosi, v. Mediation and Arbitration Centre

Telangana HC1 Sept 2016WP/29455/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding non-furnishing of certified copy of a Memorandum of Compromise. Court accepted that Respondent lacks machinery and permitted petitioner to apply for the certified copy in the Registry. Related interim relief disposed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed; petitioner permitted to make an application for certified copy in the High Court Registry.

Sri Paul Ravia Kumar Boosi, Vs Mediation and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy

¶2

and

¶3

The Hon’ble Sri Justice G.Shyam Prasad

¶4

Writ Petition No.29455 of 2016

¶5

Date: 01.09.2016

¶6

Between:

¶7

Sri Paul Ravi Kumar Boosi

¶8

..Petitioner

¶9

and

¶10

Mediation and Arbitration Center High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad, rep. by its Deputy Director and another

¶11

..Respondents

¶12

Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr.SR.Sanku

¶13

The Court made the following:

¶14

CVNR, J & GSP, J WP.No.29455 of 2016 Dt: 01.09.2016

¶15

¶16

Order: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶17

This Writ Petition is filed with the grievance that respondent No.1- Mediation and Arbitration Center has not

¶18

been furnishing certified copy of the Memorandum of Compromise, dated 11-07-2016, entered into between the petitioner and respondent No.2.

¶19

We have summoned the Deputy Director of respondent No.1 and ascertained from him the reason for not furnishing the certified copy. He has submitted that respondent No.1 does not have the machinery to furnish certified copy; that if the party files an application before the Court attached to respondent No.1, the file will be sent to the said Court to enable the latter to furnish a certified copy without any loss of time; and that the learned Counsel for the petitioner was informed of this procedure. He has assured that if the petitioner files a copy application in the High Court Registry, the certified copy will be immediately supplied to the petitioner.

¶20

In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is closed by permitting the petitioner to make an application for certified copy.

¶21

CVNR, J & GSP, J WP.No.29455 of 2016 Dt: 01.09.2016

¶22

¶23

As a sequel to closure of the Writ Petition,

¶24

WPMP.No.36464 of 2016, filed by the petitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous.

¶25

______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)

¶26

_________________ (G.Shyam Prasad, J)

¶27

Dt: 1^st September, 2016 lur

Sri Paul Ravia Kumar Boosi, v. Mediation and Arbitration Centre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Paul Ravia Kumar Boosi, v. Mediation and Arbitration Centre

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tubati Veeraiah, Vs Ganga Ravi Kumar

Bukya Ramachander Naik, Vs Bhukya Bharathi

M/s Omkara Industries Vs Union of India/The Government of India

R.Rajasubramanian, Vs Telegraph Traffic Employees Co-operative Credit Society

K. Vijayasimha Reddy, Vs The Bank of India

Muggala Satya Vishala Vs Muggala Srinivasa Rao