Guntu Boyina Kumar, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE…
CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PIL No. 282 OF 2015
18-01-2016
Between:
Guntu Boyina Kumar
… Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad – 22 and others
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PIL No. 282 OF 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Sri Mamidi Venumadhav, learned counsel holding for
Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, advocate on record for the petitioner, submits that since the technical team is examining the boundaries for the proposed weaker sections colony, he has instructions not to press the PIL.
PIL is disposed of as not pressed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ
18-01-2016 ks
Guntu Boyina Kumar
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Dilip B. Bhosale
S.V. Bhatt
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court