The petitioners submitted that respondents closed the sand reaches, rendering the PIL infructuous. The court disposed of the PIL as rendered infructuous and consequently disposed of any related miscellaneous petitions.
The PIL and related miscellaneous petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.318 of 2015
Dt:18.01.2016
Between:
K.Rajagopal Reddy and others.
… Petitioners And The State of Andhra Pradesh and others.
… Respondents
HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.318 of 2015
PC: (per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)
Mr.G.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel holding for Mr.K.Rathangapani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that after filing of the PIL, the respondents have closed both the sand reaches and in view thereof, nothing further survives in the PIL.
PIL is disposed of as rendered infructuous.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, also stand disposed of.
_________________________
________________________
Dt:18.01.2016 kdl
K.Rajagopal Reddy and others
State of Andhra Pradesh and others
DILIP B. BHOSALE
S.V. BHATT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
