Dismissed

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, v. S.Masthan Vali

Telangana HC11 Feb 2016MACMA/417/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed appeals by Oriental Insurance Company and North West Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation challenging a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award. The court held that liability is joint and several but the corporation could recover from the owner.

What did the court decide?

Against the substantial issues raised, the appeals are dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. No order as to costs.

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs S.Masthan… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO

¶2

MACMA.Nos.417 and 418 of 2016

¶3

COMMON JUDGMENT:

¶4

These two appeals are being disposed of by this common order, as they arise out of award dated 05.03.2008 in M.V.O.P.No.463 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool-cum-Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kurnool (for short, the Tribunal).

¶5

2. MACMA.No.417 of 2016 was filed by Oriental Insurance Company, whereas MACMA.No.418 of 2016 was filed by North West Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation. Both the appeals raise a common point with regard to their liability in the case of a hired bus. But the issue with regard to hired bus is now authoritatively settled by the Supreme Court in Managing Director, KSRTC v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.^[1] holding that all are jointly and severally liable to the claim; but however, the Road Transport Corporation, in terms of the lease agreement entered into with the registered owner, would be entitled to recover the amount paid to the claimants from the owner as stipulated in the agreement or from the insurer.

¶6

3. The claimant filed MVOP.No.463 of 2006 claiming a compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor accident that occurred on 01.04.2006. The claimant was aged about 7 years as on the date of accident and was studying second class. In the accident, his left leg was amputated.

¶7

4. The owner of the bus, which was involved in the accident remained ex parte and the case was contested by the appellants herein. The Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs.3,45,000/- towards compensation, by its award dated 05.03.2008, against the appellants.

¶8

5. The present appeals are preferred by Oriental Insurance Company

¶9

and North West Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation as stated above. In view of the decision in Managing Director, KSRTC’s case (supra), the award passed by the Tribunal has to be upheld. However, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation can recover the amount from the owner as stipulated in the agreement or from the insurer.

¶10

6. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶11

______________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J Date: 11.02.2016 TJMR

¶12

[1] 2015 (6) ALD 166 (SC)

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, v. S.Masthan Vali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, v. S.Masthan Vali

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shaik Ahmed Vs Shaik Ghouse

Telangana Area all Government Departments DriversAssociation Vs Sri Md. Jahangir Ali

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Shaik Ahmed

The North West Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs S.Masthan Vali, Minor, Aged 9 Yewars, rep by natural guardia

Bandaru Jhansi Rani Vs Kambala Satish

P.Chandra Mohan Reddy Vs K.v.Bhaskar