Allowed

Md. Nizamuddin v. Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited

Telangana HC14 Jul 2016CRP/5278/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a civil revision petition challenging an order where the Principal Senior Civil Judge entertained an execution petition. Relying on established law, the Court held that execution applications against arbitration awards must be filed before the Principal District Court, not the Senior Civil Judge.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition allowed; impugned order set aside; execution petition returned to decree holder for presentation to proper Court.

Md. Nizamuddin Vs Shriram Transport Finance… — Execution and Attachment | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTSICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5278 OF 2013

¶2

ORDER:

¶3

This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the petitioners/judgment debtors is directed against the orders of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge at Mancherial, Adilabad District, passed in E.P.No.228 of 2013 in Arbitration Case No.1298 of 2011.

¶4

2. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the revision petitioners/judgment debtors (‘the judgment debtor’, for brevity) and the learned counsel for the respondent/decree holder (‘the decree holder’, for brevity) and I have perused the material record.

¶5

3. The facts which are necessary to be noted as a preface to the case, in brief, are as follows:

¶6

The respondent/decree holder, having obtained an award in the aforesaid arbitration case, filed the above said execution petition before the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mancherial, Adilabad District and sought attachment of the EP scheduled property. The Court below by a docket order directed attachment of the EP schedule movables of the judgment debtors. Therefore, the aggrieved judgment debtors had filed this revision inter alia contending that the EP ought to have been filed before the Principal Civil Court in view of the settled legal position, but not before a Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Mancherial.

¶7

4. At the hearing, it is fairly conceded that the issue involved in this revision is covered by the ratio in a judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in Potlabathuni Srikanth v. Shriram City Union Finance Limited^[1] . The learned counsel for both the sides submitted

¶8

that an EP against the arbitration award shall be instituted before the Principal Civil Court i.e., the Principal District Court of a District.

¶9

5. In view of the submissions made based on the settled legal position, it follows that the order passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge by entertaining the EP is unsustainable. Viewed thus, this Court finds that this revision deserves to be allowed.

¶10

6. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed and the order impugned is set aside. The learned Principal Senior Civil Judge at Mancherial, Adilabad District is directed to return,

¶11

as per the procedure, the execution petition to the decree holder/respondent for presentation to proper Court in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶12

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.

¶13

M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J Date:14.07.2016 KH

¶14

[1] 2015 (6) ALT 629 (D.B.)

Md. Nizamuddin v. Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Nizamuddin v. Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Mabbu Bojjamma Vs the Ap State Road Transport Corporation

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Vs Sirigadde Vidyavathi , Vijaya

The New India Assurance Company Limitd Vs Yadram

Bheesetti Vishnu Prasad Vs Pappu Nirupa Rani

Bheesetti Venkata Babu Rao, Vs Pappu Nirupa Rani

Yousuf Mohammad Vs Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited