Sri P.Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners – defendants, submits that suit was filed by the respondent – plaintiff firm alleging that General Power of Attorney (GPA) was executed in favour of the first petitioner - first defendant; the first defendant got a sale deed executed by APIIC Limited in the name of plaintiff; and, thereafter, the first petitioner - first defendant executed the same in favour of the second petitioner - second defendant. Learned Senior Counsel, while drawing specific attention to para 7 of the plaint, would submit that sale deed in favour of plaintiff was executed on 07.07.2010 by APIIC and, thereafter, by virtue of GPA in favour of first petitioner – first defendant, he executed sale deed on 27.08.2010 in favour of second petitioner and GPA came to be cancelled on 05.10.2010. Learned Senior Counsel submits that the facts themselves speak and, on the face of the sale deed dated 07.07.2010, executed in favour of plaintiff by APIIC, wherein the photograph of Smt P.Kalpana, the proprietrix of the plaintiff firm, was affixed, thus, the question of first petitioner – first defendant playing fraud does not arise since the factum of GPA being executed in favour of
