In a contempt case alleging violation of an earlier order, the respondent Government Pleader submitted that the order had been complied with due to initial lack of understanding. The Court accepted the submission and closed the case.
Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
CONTEMPT CASE No. 1272 of 2016
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents, alleging wilful violation of order dated 09.06.2016 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18115 of 2016.
At the time of hearing, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies (Andhra Pradesh) that it is only on account of lack of understanding of the implications of this Court, there was some delay in implementing the order of this Court. However, once it is made clear on obtaining orders from the 2nd respondent-Revenue Divisional Officer, the 1st respondent had in fact released the stocks to the contempt petitioner. This submission of the learned Government Pleader for the respondents is not being disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
Inasmuch as, the order dated 09.06.2016 in W.P.No.18115 of 2016 passed by this Court stands complied with, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Date:04.11.2016 Ssv
Challa Kodanda Ram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
